Re: [Openbts-discuss] P2.8 release and USRP / UHD device support

[Kurtis H. <khe...@cs...>]

Thomas and I moved this off-list, but your response was EXACTLY the
same as mine, so I suppose that may have been a mistake.

I'll try to paraphrase Thomas: The short hand is that a second repo
allows users to have a repo with stuff not covered (or not yet
covered) by the CLA.

I think that's a fair point, but not one I'd personally support. I'm
mostly inclined to make sure that the repo setup encourages us all
sharing (and working on) the same code base, CLA or not.

On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 11:57 PM, Alexander Chemeris
<ale...@gm...> wrote:
> But why do you need a second svn repo? I used svn a lot and never had a need
> for a second repo. I'm quite surprised.
>
> --
> Alexander Chemeris
> Sent from my Android device. Sorry for my brevity.
>
> On Oct 22, 2011 4:55 AM, "Thomas Tsou" <tt...@vt...> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 5:35 PM, Kurtis Heimerl
> <khe...@cs...> wrote:
>> You can't push a...
>
> No, you can definitely do that.
>
> You can't easily go from one svn repo to a git repo and then to
> another, different svn repo. Actually, you can't simply go from one
> svn repo to another svn repo to begin with. That's just the nature of
> centralized version control; you're only supposed to have one main
> repo that everyone uses.
>
>  Thomas
>