Re: [Open Babel] CCL: openbabel

[Geoffrey H. <ge...@pi...>]

> Sent to CCL by: lerouvin**loria.fr
...
> I suggest you not to trust OpenBabel too much anyway... the OpenEye  
> Babel implementation is IMHO more reliable and as an academic you  
> can have it for free.

No offense, but that's a pretty broad statement, considering Open  
Eye's "babel" only has a few formats, compared to, say 80+ for Open  
Babel. Each package also has a range of functionality not included in  
the other.

But I'll bite. What do you think is "more reliable" about Open Eye?  
Particularly, it's "Babel" implementation.

Cheers,
-Geoff