|
From: Andreas M. <an...@ma...> - 2009-03-06 08:30:00
|
Andrew Dalke wrote: > On Mar 5, 2009, at 4:43 PM, Andreas Maunz wrote: >> I was wondering if there is a possibility to combine two distinct >> smarts >> patterns. > > Given c1ccccc1O and NccC, what should the merged query be? > Possibilities where the most number of atoms are shared are: > > c1(N)cc(C)ccc1O > c1c(N)cc(C)cc1O > c1cc(N)cc(C)c1O > c1ccc(N)cc1(C)O (which is impossible chemistry) > c1ccc(C)cc1(N)O (which is impossible chemistry) So I would need additional information about the actual original embedding of the fragments in the molecules to resolve this ambiguity... > It's possible to enumerate all maximum common substructure > between the two SMARTS How can that be done? Thank you, Andreas -- http://www.maunz.de I disbelieved in reincarnation in my last life, too. |