|
From: Rajarshi G. <rg...@in...> - 2009-03-05 16:48:29
|
You might take a look at http://www.daylight.com/meetings/emug00/Sayle/substruct.html which talks about SMARTS query optimizations On Mar 5, 2009, at 10:43 AM, Andreas Maunz wrote: > I was wondering if there is a possibility to combine two distinct > smarts > patterns. Of course, there is the comma OR operator (s1,s2), but I was > thinking of a more sophisticated combination, where equal parts of s1 > and s2 are "mapped onto each other" in a way such that merely the > exclusive parts of s1 and s2 are connected via OR to the common core > structure, where possible? Perhaps s1 and s2 can be matched to a > common > molecule and the result be expressed as a new smarts s12? > Thanks, Andreas > > -- > http://www.maunz.de > > I do know everything, just not all at once. It's a virtual memory > problem. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San > Francisco, CA > -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the > Enterprise > -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source > participation > -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source > code: SFAD > http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H > _______________________________________________ > OpenBabel-discuss mailing list > Ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openbabel-discuss ------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajarshi Guha <rg...@in...> GPG Fingerprint: D070 5427 CC5B 7938 929C DD13 66A1 922C 51E7 9E84 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Q: What's polite and works for the phone company? A: A deferential operator. |