Re: [open-axiom-devel] [Axiom-developer] [fricas-devel] documentation standards
A system for computer algebra and symbolic mathematics
Brought to you by:
dos-reis
From: Gabriel D. R. <gd...@in...> - 2014-12-29 10:50:09
|
On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 5:31 PM, Eugene Surowitz <su...@at...> wrote: > Ralf is only telling it as it is, > but I wish I could be even as pessimistic as him. > > This is a crisis disguised as another documentation squabble. > As I see the status of PanAxiom: > > OpenAxiom - One developer - little to no activity = dead branch. > Not really -- but YMMV. > FriCAS - One developer - one developer - system being devolved. > Axiom - One developer - when he goes Axiom goes. > > The basic issue that I see is that PanAxiom is really a > software engineering project before it can continue to live. > It brings to mind the Whirlwind project that turned the > early hacked-up computer-like light-bulb testers into > engineering standard replicable devices and spawned an industry. > A significant part its development was thoroughly documenting > what it did and how it did it. > > From the posts over the last year or so, I get these messages: > > Even minimal documentation efforts may either hard to start or > will be too much bother with to add or maintain. Besides who needs it? > As one young lady that I had set to maintaining a large system > with many undocumented changes to it said: > "I didn't know I needed to know archeology." > > The literate approach that Knuth created has no answer to > mass of existing code problem: that is, he didn't think out > a mechanism for the curious to dynamically add insights to > the system's code even if literate. Inverses are sooo.. hard. > > Oh, and PanAxiom has no systematic development of basic numerology. > > Xmas, Gene > > > > > On 12/24/2014 1:24 PM, Martin Baker wrote: > >> On 24/12/14 18:12, Ralf Hemmecke wrote: >> > It's open source development so I don't have to agree with you and can >> > choose to invest my time into something that doesn't make me unhappy. >> >> I strongly agree with Ralf on this documentation issue. >> >> Martin >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Axiom-developer mailing list > Axi...@no... > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer > |