From: Michael P. S. <mso...@di...> - 2012-01-30 15:50:18
|
On 30/01/12 Russell Warren said: > If you mean virtualenvwrapper itself, yes... it's awesome and I find it > indispensible. It makes working with virtualenv very sweet. I'm not sure > what I'd do without virtualenv/pip/virtualenvwrapper these days. > > If you mean version 3... nope, not yet. No, just virtualenvwrapper itself. I don't have any issue working with virtualenv, but I haven't tried virtualenvwrapper to see what I'm missing. Mike |