From: Jeremy N. - ml s. <jn....@le...> - 2012-10-10 20:24:29
|
Does anyone else find the new messages unwieldy compared with the old-style ones? With what we had before, since most types of post contained the whole history of a thread up to that point, I merely made sure I only had the most recent post for each thread. But now, each thread seems to have a mixture of posts; some have discussion of the ins & outs of an issue in them, while others just document different steps/ management milestones in the resolution of a problem. But compared with, say, reading posts in a newsgroup I never seem to be able to find my way around each topic easily. In fact, there's precious little threading involved. Is it just me? -- Jeremy Nicoll - my opinions are my own |
From: Mark M. <mie...@gm...> - 2012-10-12 13:43:37
|
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Jeremy Nicoll - ml sourceforge < jn....@le...> wrote: > Does anyone else find the new messages unwieldy compared with the old-style > ones? > There are a number of things about the new interface that I don't really like. I don't think the new messages are an improvement over the old format. But, all I really want is to be sure I get a notice when anything is changed. If I could be sure I was getting every notice, then the new format is okay with me. > > With what we had before, since most types of post contained the whole > history of a thread up to that point, I merely made sure I only had the > most > recent post for each thread. > I use gmail and just let Google store all the e-mails I get from SourceForge. Each e-mail from a different tracker is stored with a different tag, automatically. If I want to review the thread of a particular tracker item, it is easy to do. -- Mark Miesfeld |