From: Mark M. <mie...@gm...> - 2013-07-08 11:45:49
|
The original post had incorrect links in it, sorry. This is the correct link to the ooRexx 4.1.3 download page: http://sourceforge.net/projects/oorexx/files/oorexx/4.1.3/ and this is the correct link to the docs for ooRexx 4.1.3: http://sourceforge.net/projects/oorexx/files/oorexx-docs/ -- Mark Miesfeld On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Mark Miesfeld <mie...@gm...> wrote: > The Open Object Rexx Development Team is proud to announce the availability > of ooRexx 4.1.3. This is a bug fix only release, with about 20 bug fixes. > > Installation packages for ooRexx are available immediately on SourceForge. > You can download ooRexx 4.1.3 from: > > http://sourceforge.net/projects/oorexx/files/oorexx/4.1.3/<http://sourceforge.net/projects/oorexx/files/oorexx/4.1.2/> > > Complete documentation in PDF and HTML format can be downloaded from: > > http://sourceforge.net/projects/oorexx/files/oorexx-docs/4.1.3/<http://sourceforge.net/projects/oorexx/files/oorexx-docs/4.1.2/> > > Download the CHANGES document, in the ooRex files area, to see the list > of fixes. The _ReadMe.pdf or _ReadMe.html files contain additional information > concerning the release. If you discover bugs please open a bug report at: > > http://sourceforge.net/p/oorexx/bugs/ > > -- > The ooRexx Development Team > |
From: Garry S. <smi...@td...> - 2013-07-09 18:40:11
|
Mark, I don’t see where I can open a issue. BTW: I am running Windows 7, 64 bit Garry Smithwick Phone: 770-406-6010 Mobile: 678-908-7319 Email: mailto:smi...@td... AIM ID: GarrySmithwick FaceBook: www.facebook.com/garrysmithwick Home Page: personalpages.tds.net/~garrysmithwick From: Mark Miesfeld Sent: Monday, July 08, 2013 7:45 AM To: Open Object Rexx Announcements ; Open Object Rexx Users ; ooRexx Dev List ; RexxLA Subject: [Oorexx-announce] Correction,Re: Announce ooRexx 4.1.3 Is Now Available The original post had incorrect links in it, sorry. This is the correct link to the ooRexx 4.1.3 download page: http://sourceforge.net/projects/oorexx/files/oorexx/4.1.3/ and this is the correct link to the docs for ooRexx 4.1.3: http://sourceforge.net/projects/oorexx/files/oorexx-docs/ -- Mark Miesfeld On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Mark Miesfeld <mie...@gm...> wrote: The Open Object Rexx Development Team is proud to announce the availability of ooRexx 4.1.3. This is a bug fix only release, with about 20 bug fixes. Installation packages for ooRexx are available immediately on SourceForge. You can download ooRexx 4.1.3 from: http://sourceforge.net/projects/oorexx/files/oorexx/4.1.3/ Complete documentation in PDF and HTML format can be downloaded from: http://sourceforge.net/projects/oorexx/files/oorexx-docs/4.1.3/ Download the CHANGES document, in the ooRex files area, to see the list of fixes. The _ReadMe.pdf or _ReadMe.html files contain additional information concerning the release. If you discover bugs please open a bug report at: http://sourceforge.net/p/oorexx/bugs/ -- The ooRexx Development Team -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Oorexx-announce mailing list Oor...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-announce |
From: Garry S. <smi...@td...> - 2013-07-09 19:09:34
|
This fails with syntax error on “PageTitle = oIE~document~title” on the new release. Went back to 4.1.1 and it works. Several of my apps failed. Could not get the “document” object. I will open a report. url = 'https://www.wireless.att.com/olam/dashboardAction.olamexecute' oIE = .OLEObject~New("InternetExplorer.Application") oIE~Visible = .True oIE~Top = 1 oIE~Left = 1 oIE~Width = 1000 oIE~Height = 1000 oIE~navigate(url) Do 600 While oIE~readyState < 4 | oIE~busy = 1 Call Syssleep 0.1 End PageTitle = oIE~document~title Say Page PageTitle Garry Smithwick Phone: 770-406-6010 Mobile: 678-908-7319 Email: mailto:smi...@td... AIM ID: GarrySmithwick FaceBook: www.facebook.com/garrysmithwick Home Page: personalpages.tds.net/~garrysmithwick From: Mark Miesfeld Sent: Monday, July 08, 2013 7:45 AM To: Open Object Rexx Announcements ; Open Object Rexx Users ; ooRexx Dev List ; RexxLA Subject: [Oorexx-announce] Correction,Re: Announce ooRexx 4.1.3 Is Now Available The original post had incorrect links in it, sorry. This is the correct link to the ooRexx 4.1.3 download page: http://sourceforge.net/projects/oorexx/files/oorexx/4.1.3/ and this is the correct link to the docs for ooRexx 4.1.3: http://sourceforge.net/projects/oorexx/files/oorexx-docs/ -- Mark Miesfeld On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Mark Miesfeld <mie...@gm...> wrote: The Open Object Rexx Development Team is proud to announce the availability of ooRexx 4.1.3. This is a bug fix only release, with about 20 bug fixes. Installation packages for ooRexx are available immediately on SourceForge. You can download ooRexx 4.1.3 from: http://sourceforge.net/projects/oorexx/files/oorexx/4.1.3/ Complete documentation in PDF and HTML format can be downloaded from: http://sourceforge.net/projects/oorexx/files/oorexx-docs/4.1.3/ Download the CHANGES document, in the ooRex files area, to see the list of fixes. The _ReadMe.pdf or _ReadMe.html files contain additional information concerning the release. If you discover bugs please open a bug report at: http://sourceforge.net/p/oorexx/bugs/ -- The ooRexx Development Team -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Oorexx-announce mailing list Oor...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-announce |
From: Bob C. <bo...@mc...> - 2013-07-09 19:47:43
|
I don;t know or write Java. Does the switch "oIE~Visible = .True" enable the output of any diagnostics to be seen when the program is executed? Does the "Trace'R'" command work with 64 bit ooRexx? Bob cox ----- Original Message ----- From: Garry Smithwick <smi...@td...> To: Open Object Rexx Announcements <oor...@li...> Sent: Tue, 9 Jul 2013 13:05:56 -0500 (CDT) Subject: [Oorexx-announce] Failure This fails with syntax error on “PageTitle = oIE~document~title” on the new release. Went back to 4.1.1 and it works. Several of my apps failed. Could not get the “document” object. I will open a report. url = 'https://www.wireless.att.com/olam/dashboardAction.olamexecute' oIE = .OLEObject~New("InternetExplorer.Application") oIE~Visible = .True oIE~Top = 1 oIE~Left = 1 oIE~Width = 1000 oIE~Height = 1000 oIE~navigate(url) Do 600 While oIE~readyState < 4 | oIE~busy = 1 Call Syssleep 0.1 End PageTitle = oIE~document~title Say Page PageTitle Garry Smithwick Phone: 770-406-6010 Mobile: 678-908-7319 Email: mailto:smi...@td... AIM ID: GarrySmithwick FaceBook: www.facebook.com/garrysmithwick Home Page: personalpages.tds.net/~garrysmithwick From: Mark Miesfeld Sent: Monday, July 08, 2013 7:45 AM To: Open Object Rexx Announcements ; Open Object Rexx Users ; ooRexx Dev List ; RexxLA Subject: [Oorexx-announce] Correction,Re: Announce ooRexx 4.1.3 Is Now Available The original post had incorrect links in it, sorry. This is the correct link to the ooRexx 4.1.3 download page: http://sourceforge.net/projects/oorexx/files/oorexx/4.1.3/ and this is the correct link to the docs for ooRexx 4.1.3: http://sourceforge.net/projects/oorexx/files/oorexx-docs/ -- Mark Miesfeld On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Mark Miesfeld <mie...@gm...> wrote: The Open Object Rexx Development Team is proud to announce the availability of ooRexx 4.1.3. This is a bug fix only release, with about 20 bug fixes. Installation packages for ooRexx are available immediately on SourceForge. You can download ooRexx 4.1.3 from: http://sourceforge.net/projects/oorexx/files/oorexx/4.1.3/ Complete documentation in PDF and HTML format can be downloaded from: http://sourceforge.net/projects/oorexx/files/oorexx-docs/4.1.3/ Download the CHANGES document, in the ooRex files area, to see the list of fixes. The _ReadMe.pdf or _ReadMe.html files contain additional information concerning the release. If you discover bugs please open a bug report at: http://sourceforge.net/p/oorexx/bugs/ -- The ooRexx Development Team -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Oorexx-announce mailing list Oor...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-announce |
From: Garry S. <smi...@td...> - 2013-07-09 20:42:48
|
oIE~Visible = .true sets the object value visible to true. The normal Windows script uses oIE.visible, but for rexx we use "~" instead of "." It simply means internet explorer screen display (web site) will be visible. Yes, trace works, but won't really tell you anymore than the syntax error. Garry Smithwick Phone: 770-406-6010 Mobile: 678-908-7319 Email: smi...@td... AIM ID: GarrySmithwick FaceBook: www.facebook.com/garrysmithwick Home Page: personalpages.tds.net/~garrysmithwick -----Original Message----- From: Bob Cox Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2013 3:47 PM To: Open Object Rexx Announcements Subject: Re: [Oorexx-announce] Failure I don;t know or write Java. Does the switch "oIE~Visible = .True" enable the output of any diagnostics to be seen when the program is executed? Does the "Trace'R'" command work with 64 bit ooRexx? Bob cox ----- Original Message ----- From: Garry Smithwick <smi...@td...> To: Open Object Rexx Announcements <oor...@li...> Sent: Tue, 9 Jul 2013 13:05:56 -0500 (CDT) Subject: [Oorexx-announce] Failure This fails with syntax error on “PageTitle = oIE~document~title” on the new release. Went back to 4.1.1 and it works. Several of my apps failed. Could not get the “document” object. I will open a report. url = 'https://www.wireless.att.com/olam/dashboardAction.olamexecute' oIE = .OLEObject~New("InternetExplorer.Application") oIE~Visible = .True oIE~Top = 1 oIE~Left = 1 oIE~Width = 1000 oIE~Height = 1000 oIE~navigate(url) Do 600 While oIE~readyState < 4 | oIE~busy = 1 Call Syssleep 0.1 End PageTitle = oIE~document~title Say Page PageTitle Garry Smithwick Phone: 770-406-6010 Mobile: 678-908-7319 Email: mailto:smi...@td... AIM ID: GarrySmithwick FaceBook: www.facebook.com/garrysmithwick Home Page: personalpages.tds.net/~garrysmithwick From: Mark Miesfeld Sent: Monday, July 08, 2013 7:45 AM To: Open Object Rexx Announcements ; Open Object Rexx Users ; ooRexx Dev List ; RexxLA Subject: [Oorexx-announce] Correction,Re: Announce ooRexx 4.1.3 Is Now Available The original post had incorrect links in it, sorry. This is the correct link to the ooRexx 4.1.3 download page: http://sourceforge.net/projects/oorexx/files/oorexx/4.1.3/ and this is the correct link to the docs for ooRexx 4.1.3: http://sourceforge.net/projects/oorexx/files/oorexx-docs/ -- Mark Miesfeld On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Mark Miesfeld <mie...@gm...> wrote: The Open Object Rexx Development Team is proud to announce the availability of ooRexx 4.1.3. This is a bug fix only release, with about 20 bug fixes. Installation packages for ooRexx are available immediately on SourceForge. You can download ooRexx 4.1.3 from: http://sourceforge.net/projects/oorexx/files/oorexx/4.1.3/ Complete documentation in PDF and HTML format can be downloaded from: http://sourceforge.net/projects/oorexx/files/oorexx-docs/4.1.3/ Download the CHANGES document, in the ooRex files area, to see the list of fixes. The _ReadMe.pdf or _ReadMe.html files contain additional information concerning the release. If you discover bugs please open a bug report at: http://sourceforge.net/p/oorexx/bugs/ -- The ooRexx Development Team -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Oorexx-announce mailing list Oor...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-announce ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds. Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Oorexx-announce mailing list Oor...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-announce |
From: Bob C. <bo...@mc...> - 2013-07-10 00:18:37
|
#1: Tried putting the oIEF~Visible = .true statement in my code - - - Still didn't work. #2 Moved the Visible statement to just after the program definition (procedure) statement - - - didn't work. #3: Moved the Address Command to just before the Visible statement - - - didn't work. I'm still getting the flash presentation of the output screen but it is only visible about 0.1 seconds or less. That's too short a time interval to see anything meaningful. When I have the Trace "R" statement the output should include all the assignments in the stack. Under 370-VM the system would then stop and one could enter another statement or correct the one displayed statement or an enter key would proceed to the next statement in the script. If exit was entered the interpreter would stop. If trace "O" was entered the tracing function would stop and the script would be interpreted until either the end of the program or another Trace command was interpreted. It makes debugging for a novice or old person prone to spelling errors much more efficient. Syntax error merely indicates something is wrong but doesn't say what so one has to do more analysis to find the error. It is fine when the programming is thought to be done and unexpected data values are entered thus identifying the problem but particularly with complex logical statements the trace function is invaluable. Bob Cox ----- Original Message ----- From: Garry Smithwick <smi...@td...> To: Open Object Rexx Announcements <oor...@li...> Sent: Tue, 9 Jul 2013 15:13:48 -0500 (CDT) Subject: Re: [Oorexx-announce] Failure oIE~Visible = .true sets the object value visible to true. The normal Windows script uses oIE.visible, but for rexx we use "~" instead of "." It simply means internet explorer screen display (web site) will be visible. Yes, trace works, but won't really tell you anymore than the syntax error. Garry Smithwick Phone: 770-406-6010 Mobile: 678-908-7319 Email: smi...@td... AIM ID: GarrySmithwick FaceBook: www.facebook.com/garrysmithwick Home Page: personalpages.tds.net/~garrysmithwick -----Original Message----- From: Bob Cox Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2013 3:47 PM To: Open Object Rexx Announcements Subject: Re: [Oorexx-announce] Failure I don;t know or write Java. Does the switch "oIE~Visible = .True" enable the output of any diagnostics to be seen when the program is executed? Does the "Trace'R'" command work with 64 bit ooRexx? Bob cox ----- Original Message ----- From: Garry Smithwick <smi...@td...> To: Open Object Rexx Announcements <oor...@li...> Sent: Tue, 9 Jul 2013 13:05:56 -0500 (CDT) Subject: [Oorexx-announce] Failure This fails with syntax error on “PageTitle = oIE~document~title” on the new release. Went back to 4.1.1 and it works. Several of my apps failed. Could not get the “document” object. I will open a report. url = 'https://www.wireless.att.com/olam/dashboardAction.olamexecute' oIE = .OLEObject~New("InternetExplorer.Application") oIE~Visible = .True oIE~Top = 1 oIE~Left = 1 oIE~Width = 1000 oIE~Height = 1000 oIE~navigate(url) Do 600 While oIE~readyState < 4 | oIE~busy = 1 Call Syssleep 0.1 End PageTitle = oIE~document~title Say Page PageTitle Garry Smithwick Phone: 770-406-6010 Mobile: 678-908-7319 Email: mailto:smi...@td... AIM ID: GarrySmithwick FaceBook: www.facebook.com/garrysmithwick Home Page: personalpages.tds.net/~garrysmithwick From: Mark Miesfeld Sent: Monday, July 08, 2013 7:45 AM To: Open Object Rexx Announcements ; Open Object Rexx Users ; ooRexx Dev List ; RexxLA Subject: [Oorexx-announce] Correction,Re: Announce ooRexx 4.1.3 Is Now Available The original post had incorrect links in it, sorry. This is the correct link to the ooRexx 4.1.3 download page: http://sourceforge.net/projects/oorexx/files/oorexx/4.1.3/ and this is the correct link to the docs for ooRexx 4.1.3: http://sourceforge.net/projects/oorexx/files/oorexx-docs/ -- Mark Miesfeld On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Mark Miesfeld <mie...@gm...> wrote: The Open Object Rexx Development Team is proud to announce the availability of ooRexx 4.1.3. This is a bug fix only release, with about 20 bug fixes. Installation packages for ooRexx are available immediately on SourceForge. You can download ooRexx 4.1.3 from: http://sourceforge.net/projects/oorexx/files/oorexx/4.1.3/ Complete documentation in PDF and HTML format can be downloaded from: http://sourceforge.net/projects/oorexx/files/oorexx-docs/4.1.3/ Download the CHANGES document, in the ooRex files area, to see the list of fixes. The _ReadMe.pdf or _ReadMe.html files contain additional information concerning the release. If you discover bugs please open a bug report at: http://sourceforge.net/p/oorexx/bugs/ -- The ooRexx Development Team -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Oorexx-announce mailing list Oor...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-announce ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds. Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Oorexx-announce mailing list Oor...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-announce ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds. Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Oorexx-announce mailing list Oor...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-announce |
From: Steve S. <ste...@gm...> - 2013-07-10 06:23:41
|
The standard trick to see if a fleeting window contains anything useful is to video the display. You don't need anything fancy; almost any phone with a camera should do the job. On 10 July 2013 01:18, Bob Cox <bo...@mc...> wrote: > I'm still getting the flash presentation of the output screen but it is > only visible about 0.1 seconds or less. That's too short a time interval > to see anything meaningful. -- Steve Swift http://www.swiftys.org.uk |
From: Rick M. <obj...@gm...> - 2013-07-10 21:27:57
|
No, the ? prefix has always been required for interactive debug, even on VM/CMS. Rick On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 5:24 PM, <Wil...@jb...> wrote: > > I'm not particularly current in the OOREXX implementation, but I spent a > lot of years doing Rexx in VM/CMS. > > TRACE I -- 'I' for 'Interactive'. Pauses after each instruction. > > On some other platforms (most DOS/Windows implementations I've seen) > there's also the '?' prefix, but I don't recall having it, let alone > needing it in VM/CMS. On the other hand, the last time I worked in that > environment was 1996.... > > > Does this help? > > > William Lightner > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics > Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics > Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds. > Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today! > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > _______________________________________________ > Oorexx-announce mailing list > Oor...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-announce > > |
From: Harsen, M. F <Mark.Harsen@MissouriState.edu> - 2013-07-10 21:59:26
|
I've been programming REXX since the first versions on VM/CMS which replaced EXEC and EXEC2. The "I" stands for "Intermediates", not "Interactive". And yes, I concur that the "?" has always been required for an interactive trace from the birth of REXX. I can't say that some version somewhere didn't do this, but I would think it would violate the language standard. Best Regards, -Mark From: Rick McGuire [mailto:obj...@gm...] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 4:28 PM To: Open Object Rexx Announcements Subject: Re: [Oorexx-announce] Failure No, the ? prefix has always been required for interactive debug, even on VM/CMS. Rick On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 5:24 PM, <Wil...@jb...<mailto:Wil...@jb...>> wrote: I'm not particularly current in the OOREXX implementation, but I spent a lot of years doing Rexx in VM/CMS. TRACE I -- 'I' for 'Interactive'. Pauses after each instruction. On some other platforms (most DOS/Windows implementations I've seen) there's also the '?' prefix, but I don't recall having it, let alone needing it in VM/CMS. On the other hand, the last time I worked in that environment was 1996.... Does this help? William Lightner ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds. Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Oorexx-announce mailing list Oor...@li...<mailto:Oor...@li...> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-announce |
From: Bob C. <bo...@mc...> - 2013-07-10 22:04:37
|
You are correct. Thanks. I try to learn something new every day! Bob ----- Original Message ----- From: Rick McGuire <obj...@gm...> To: Open Object Rexx Announcements <oor...@li...> Sent: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 16:27:48 -0500 (CDT) Subject: Re: [Oorexx-announce] Failure No, the ? prefix has always been required for interactive debug, even on VM/CMS. Rick On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 5:24 PM, <Wil...@jb...> wrote: > > I'm not particularly current in the OOREXX implementation, but I spent a > lot of years doing Rexx in VM/CMS. > > TRACE I -- 'I' for 'Interactive'. Pauses after each instruction. > > On some other platforms (most DOS/Windows implementations I've seen) > there's also the '?' prefix, but I don't recall having it, let alone > needing it in VM/CMS. On the other hand, the last time I worked in that > environment was 1996.... > > > Does this help? > > > William Lightner > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics > Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics > Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds. > Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today! > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > _______________________________________________ > Oorexx-announce mailing list > Oor...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-announce > > |
From: <Wil...@jb...> - 2013-07-11 16:12:15
|
You're undoubtedly right. I'm the one out of practice! Thanks, From: Rick McGuire <obj...@gm...> To: Open Object Rexx Announcements <oor...@li...>, Date: 07/10/2013 04:28 PM Subject: Re: [Oorexx-announce] Failure No, the ? prefix has always been required for interactive debug, even on VM/CMS. Rick On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 5:24 PM, <Wil...@jb...> wrote: I'm not particularly current in the OOREXX implementation, but I spent a lot of years doing Rexx in VM/CMS. TRACE I -- 'I' for 'Interactive'. Pauses after each instruction. On some other platforms (most DOS/Windows implementations I've seen) there's also the '?' prefix, but I don't recall having it, let alone needing it in VM/CMS. On the other hand, the last time I worked in that environment was 1996.... Does this help? William Lightner ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds. Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Oorexx-announce mailing list Oor...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-announce ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds. Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Oorexx-announce mailing list Oor...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-announce |
From: René J. <rvj...@xs...> - 2013-07-11 19:02:39
|
Glad that we solved this. The next time, can we please not use the announcements list for things other than announcements? I received several complaints from people who have the other lists on digest. Many thanks in advance, René Vincent Jansen On 11 jul. 2013, at 18:12, Wil...@jb... wrote: > You're undoubtedly right. I'm the one out of practice! > > > Thanks, > > > > > From: Rick McGuire <obj...@gm...> > To: Open Object Rexx Announcements <oor...@li...>, > Date: 07/10/2013 04:28 PM > Subject: Re: [Oorexx-announce] Failure > > > > No, the ? prefix has always been required for interactive debug, even on VM/CMS. > > Rick > > > On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 5:24 PM, <Wil...@jb...> wrote: > > I'm not particularly current in the OOREXX implementation, but I spent a lot of years doing Rexx in VM/CMS. > > TRACE I -- 'I' for 'Interactive'. Pauses after each instruction. > > On some other platforms (most DOS/Windows implementations I've seen) there's also the '?' prefix, but I don't recall having it, let alone needing it in VM/CMS. On the other hand, the last time I worked in that environment was 1996.... > > > Does this help? > > > William Lightner > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics > Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics > Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds. > Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today! > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > _______________________________________________ > Oorexx-announce mailing list > Oor...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-announce > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics > Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics > Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds. > Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today! > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk_______________________________________________ > Oorexx-announce mailing list > Oor...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-announce > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics > Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics > Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds. > Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today! > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > _______________________________________________ > Oorexx-announce mailing list > Oor...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-announce |