one-project-devel Mailing List for ONE Open Negotiation Environment (Page 4)
Status: Planning
Brought to you by:
solutaone
Menu
▾
▴
one-project-devel — ONE Project Developer Mailing List
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2006 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(10) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 |
Jan
(19) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(25) |
Dec
(12) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(2) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Pierfranco F. <pfe...@so...> - 2006-12-19 11:57:50
|
Hi what about: Donald: - Negotiation Coordinator - Negotiation Director - Negotiation Master Console - Master Negotiation Console - Tenderee Negotiation Station - Tenderee Negotiation Booth Mikey: - Negotiation Console - Tenderor Negotiation Station - Tenderor Negotiation Booth I'm for: -D: Negotiation Master Console -M: Negotiation Console Please notice that these are CIM terms, i.e. they do not pretend to express tech design features but rather the functional context where they are to be used, We will understand that there will be a Negotiation Coordinator/Manager component beneath them that control the execution of the underlying workflow. There will also be a runtime GUI generator, this does affect the naming convention I'm referring in this email kind regards ciao -- |
|
From: Pierfranco F. <pfe...@so...> - 2006-12-18 12:09:48
|
Hi Michele, welcome aboard. Yes we will use Maven, kind regards Pierfranco michele bianchi wrote: > hi all, > agree. what about the building tool, are you considering maven2? > > m > > Jason Finnegan wrote: >> We believe that Spring Framework and tomcat is the best choice for now. >> >> Jason >> >> giovanni cortese wrote: >> >>> Pierfranco Ferronato wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Dear partners, >>>> >>>> I believe we ought to consider already an application server for >>>> some early development and prototypes. >>>> The Spring Framework[1] can be IMO a valuable alternative, BTW: >>>> it's >>> very good choice to me >>> >>> >>>> used by soapod[2] which is a app serv we will investigate. >>>> >>>> Spring is also Tomcat compatible, this means that partners with >>>> Tomcat experience will not have a learning curve, >>>> >>>> Any different viewpoint? >>>> >>>> Pierfranco >>>> >>>> [1] http://www.springframework.org/ >>>> [2] http://www.soapod.org/ >>>> >>>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT >>> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to >>> share your >>> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash >>> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> One-project-devel mailing list >>> One...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/one-project-devel >>> >>> >> >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > One-project-devel mailing list > One...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/one-project-devel > |
|
From: michele b. <mic...@gm...> - 2006-12-18 12:00:49
|
hi all, i'm a new member here on one-project. i'm michele bianchi, from create-net. i'm a software developer. this project sounds very interesting and i hope we're going to work together with passion to build a good application. thanks in advance m |
|
From: michele b. <mic...@gm...> - 2006-12-18 08:21:50
|
hi all, agree. what about the building tool, are you considering maven2? m Jason Finnegan wrote: > We believe that Spring Framework and tomcat is the best choice for now. > > Jason > > giovanni cortese wrote: > >> Pierfranco Ferronato wrote: >> >> >>> Dear partners, >>> >>> I believe we ought to consider already an application server for some >>> early development and prototypes. >>> The Spring Framework[1] can be IMO a valuable alternative, BTW: it's >>> >>> >> very good choice to me >> >> >>> used by soapod[2] which is a app serv we will investigate. >>> >>> Spring is also Tomcat compatible, this means that partners with Tomcat >>> experience will not have a learning curve, >>> >>> Any different viewpoint? >>> >>> Pierfranco >>> >>> [1] http://www.springframework.org/ >>> [2] http://www.soapod.org/ >>> >>> >>> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT >> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your >> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash >> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV >> _______________________________________________ >> One-project-devel mailing list >> One...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/one-project-devel >> >> > > |
|
From: Jason F. <jfi...@ts...> - 2006-12-11 12:58:34
|
We believe that Spring Framework and tomcat is the best choice for now. Jason giovanni cortese wrote: >Pierfranco Ferronato wrote: > > >>Dear partners, >> >>I believe we ought to consider already an application server for some >>early development and prototypes. >>The Spring Framework[1] can be IMO a valuable alternative, BTW: it's >> >> >very good choice to me > > >>used by soapod[2] which is a app serv we will investigate. >> >>Spring is also Tomcat compatible, this means that partners with Tomcat >>experience will not have a learning curve, >> >>Any different viewpoint? >> >>Pierfranco >> >>[1] http://www.springframework.org/ >>[2] http://www.soapod.org/ >> >> >> > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------- >Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT >Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your >opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash >http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV >_______________________________________________ >One-project-devel mailing list >One...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/one-project-devel > > -- Jason Finnegan Telecommunications Software and Systems Group Waterford Institute of Technology Cork Road Waterford Ireland Tel:00353 (0) 51 302961 Fax:00353 (0) 51 302901 mail: jfi...@ts... web: http://www.tssg.org |
|
From: giovanni c. <gco...@cr...> - 2006-12-11 12:49:37
|
Pierfranco Ferronato wrote: > Dear partners, > > I believe we ought to consider already an application server for some > early development and prototypes. > The Spring Framework[1] can be IMO a valuable alternative, BTW: it's very good choice to me > used by soapod[2] which is a app serv we will investigate. > > Spring is also Tomcat compatible, this means that partners with Tomcat > experience will not have a learning curve, > > Any different viewpoint? > > Pierfranco > > [1] http://www.springframework.org/ > [2] http://www.soapod.org/ > |
|
From: Pierfranco F. <pfe...@so...> - 2006-12-11 12:15:48
|
Dear partners, I believe we ought to consider already an application server for some early development and prototypes. The Spring Framework[1] can be IMO a valuable alternative, BTW: it's used by soapod[2] which is a app serv we will investigate. Spring is also Tomcat compatible, this means that partners with Tomcat experience will not have a learning curve, Any different viewpoint? Pierfranco [1] http://www.springframework.org/ [2] http://www.soapod.org/ -- |
1 message has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
