|
From: Mark M. <mm...@ri...> - 2019-10-16 21:07:35
|
Hi Max,
You need to make sure to set up your include path right. If /opt/ros/kinetic/include comes before /usr/local/include, then the header files of the old version of OMPL will be found during the compilation of your code.
Best,
Mark
> On Oct 16, 2019, at 11:13 AM, Max Baeten <m.j...@gm...> wrote:
>
> Hi OMPL wizards,
>
> Im having trouble linking against the correct ompl version on my ubuntu system where I have ROS kinetic installed. I have two versions installed one installed via ROS and one compiled from source:
>
> /opt/ros/kinetic/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libompl.so.1.2.1
> /usr/local/lib/libompl.so.1.4.2
>
> In CMakeList.txt in my own ros package, I can use the following lines to select either version of OMPL such that I can link my code against the new from source installed 1.4.2 version.
>
> find_package(ompl 1.4.2 REQUIRED)
> message("OMPL_VERSIOOMPL version: 1.2.1
> N: ${OMPL_VERSION}")
>
> This works, Cmake prints the correct 1.4.2 version. Also when I leave the version number out then it prints 1.2.1 (ROS version) and when i put 1.4.3 it gives an error that it cant't find that version.
>
> So the linking to the correct library seems to work. However when I run my code that includes the following:
>
> std::cout << "OMPL version: " << OMPL_VERSION << std::endl;
>
> Then it prints out:
> OMPL version: 1.2.1
>
> Either i am still linking to the wrong ompl lib or the printing of the ompl version is incorrect? Any ideas?
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Max
>
> _______________________________________________
> ompl-users mailing list
> omp...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ompl-users
|