Re: [ompl-users] OMPL ABI compatible releases

[Leopold Palomo-A. <le...@al...>]

El 07/09/18 a les 16:01, Mark Moll ha escrit:
> Hi Leopold,
> 
> I did a diff between 1.3.0 and 1.3.1 and the API did change slightly. Mostly removing “const” from plain-old-datatypes like int and double in method arguments. I was trying to be cautious and bumped the ABI level, but that may not have been necessary.
> 
> The ABI number is not derived from the OMPL version. It’s simply a coincidence that at some point it synced up with the first two version numbers. I don’t understand why you would want to patch that. It’s not like anyone needs to remember ABI numbers. To me, it’s just a way for the dynamic library loader to verify that a compatible version is found. So I’d advise against patching the ABI version of OMPL 1.4.0.
> 

Ok,

I drop the patch and soon I will push to the debian archive. I will put
also an Ubuntu package.

OTOH I'm sorry for the python bindings, but the dependencies are
difficult to package in Debian. In any case, I hope that this autumn I
will make a new try and we can finally have a Python binding for OMPL.

Cheers,

Leo


-- 
--
Linux User 152692     GPG: 05F4A7A949A2D9AA
Catalonia
-------------------------------------
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?