Re: [ompl-users] OMPL ABI compatible releases

[Leopold Palomo-A. <le...@al...>]

On 07/09/18 09:12, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
> On 06/09/18 16:04, Mark Moll wrote:
>> Hi Leopold,
>>
>> Yes, unless I made mistake. Patch-level releases should preserve ABI compatibility.
>>
> 
> Mark!!
> 
> ompl 1.3.3 install libompl.so.14 instead of 13. This is a mistake IMHO.
> 

Mark,

checking OMPL_ABI_VERSION I have found:

1.2.1 -> 12
1.3.0 -> 13
1.3.1 -> 14
1.3.2 -> 14
1.3.3 -> 14
1.4.0 -> 15

Are you aware of this? Pay attention that you jump one number from 1.3.0 and
1.3.1. and it's a pity because it was easy to remember that the first two digits
means the ABI version.

I'm preparing a new debian package (1.4.0) and, could be problematic if I patch
OMPL_ABI_VERSION to 14 instead of 15?

Leopold


-- 
--
Linux User 152692     GPG: 05F4A7A949A2D9AA
Catalonia
-------------------------------------
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?