Re: [Omd-dev] tuning of Card schema

[Jeff T. <sjt...@ya...>]

--- Hogan Long <Ho...@Ne...> wrote:
> Anything I don't comment on was fine...
> 
> 1) caps vers non caps...
> (And changes because of some xml files you found)
> 
> ...

can you point me to a "full bundle" of xml files?  i only found
prophecy, invasion, and apocalypse.

i agree with your stance about standards, but the full set that i
had was perfectly consistent, but disagreed with the schema.

so, here's what i think is "correct" for the schema:
    - "Uncommon" instead of "U"
    - "White" instead of "white", for color
 
differences between neturalground omd files and the schema:

of the three xml files i just got from the front page of
neutralground.net (ex.pr.xml, ex.in.xml, ex.ap.xml),
only ex.ap.xml uses the correct rarity.  the other two
use single-letters.  

ex.ap.xml uses "Multi" for a color.  do you want to add
that?

there are a lot of split-card colors (e.g., "Red/Blue")
in ex.ap.xml and ex.in.xml.  do you want to add all
combinations, or try something like:
    <color>Red</color>
    <color>Blue</color>

ex.ap.xml uses "Land" and "Artifact" as colors.  should
we add them?

ex.in.xml has a number of empty colors:
    <color></color>
(this is used, for example, on cards where you 
can choose the color as it comes into play).  should
this be "Colorless"?

or, since colors are getting somewhat messy,
maybe we should not enumerate them right now?





__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger
http://phonecard.yahoo.com/