Re: [Ocaml-lib-devel] Dllist

[Brian H. <bh...@sp...>]

On Wed, 25 May 2005, Christophe TROESTLER wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Is there a good reason (aside from implementation easiness) not to
> allow Dllist to be empty?  IMHO, empty lists are very useful and it is
> rather an hindrance that Dllists cannot be.

My original implementation did allow for empty lists, but it got 
overridden.

Brian