From: William D. N. <wne...@cs...> - 2005-04-25 15:58:23
|
On Mon, 25 Apr 2005, Nicolas Cannasse wrote: > I personaly never had the use for Bigints, so I might not the best to decide > whatever extensions are needed or not. Does some other people here already > felt frustrated with current Bigint API ? Well, I rarely use it due to it's excessive verbosity (which could be helped by a separate Infixes module, a la mlgmp) as well as its lack of bitwise operations and features like to/from_string_base, where you can input/output big ints in formats other than decimal. However, I'm more concerned with the fact that it's... well... broken <http://pauillac.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs/open?id=3586>. William D. Neumann --- "There's just so many extra children, we could just feed the children to these tigers. We don't need them, we're not doing anything with them. Tigers are noble and sleek; children are loud and messy." -- Neko Case Think of XML as Lisp for COBOL programmers. -- Tony-A (some guy on /.) |