From: Nicolas C. <war...@fr...> - 2004-06-01 17:42:09
|
> > complexity on basic operations. Now if you have good arguments for double > > linked list usage, I'm open to further talks. > > but anyway, in my particular case dynarray will do fine (though i would > still consider a doubly linked list to be generic enough that it deserves > consideration). That's true, but we need to consider the following : adding a new data structure is important not only if it is "possibly useful" but also if it has interesting properties that are making it different enough from previous data structures. > now, one point on the dynArray implementation: i compile with all warnings > turned on, and get many warnings of type: > > Warning: labels were omitted in the application of this function > > (due to all the imake applications omitting ~tag and ~size). Please submit a patch in order to correct theses, I can do it later but not so much time recently. Regards, Nicolas Cannasse |