|
From: Erick A. <eri...@gm...> - 2014-03-05 08:57:58
|
indeed, even better. On 5 March 2014 09:49, Nicolas Le Novere <n.l...@gm...> wrote: > On 05/03/14 08:05, Erick Antezana wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I agree with Chris: the proliferation of namespaces should be to some > extent controlled... > > > > My take on this issue would be: > > > > - continue keeping namespaces in the OBO foundry which *only* correspond > to domain ontologies > > - maintain a separate resource, something such as > http://www.geneontology.org/cgi-bin/xrefs.cgi, for application ontologies. > > Something like > > http://identifiers.org? > > > cheers, > > Erick > > > > > > On 5 March 2014 02:37, Chris Mungall <cjm...@lb... <mailto: > cjm...@lb...>> wrote: > > > > Hi Oliver, > > > > I have a general concern, maybe I'm not getting something. > > > > There are a very large number of databases out there. Many of these > can > > be translated to an ontology. > > > > It's not clear that there's always a clear win in doing this (but > that's > > a question that may be best answered by doing further experimentation > > such as what you're doing). > > > > But in doing this we should not be creating an administrative burden > by > > registering new OBO namespaces for every database X species > combination > > out there. And we definitely should not be contributing to the ID > > mapping curse by minting yet another set of numeric IDs. > > > > Do you really need this to be an OBO library ontology? I know we have > > something of a precedent here with things like the NCBITaxonomy, but > > perhaps not every translated resource needs to have the magic OBO > purl. > > > > If you really want to have these translations be in the OBO space, > why > > don't we set up one generic ID space and put everything under that, > > relaxing the URI guidelines? For example, let's say you wanted to > grab > > an ID space "OMICS". You could then use this to prefix the URIs of > > database-sourced entities retaining the original ID. E.g. > > purl....obo/OMICS/REACTOME_12345. This way we don't end up with a > > proliferation of "ontologies", and you have the freedom to keep > adding > > new entities (as you most likely will). > > > > > > > > > > > > On 4 Mar 2014, at 12:18, He, Yongqun wrote: > > > > > Additional information: > > > > > > INO/HINO website: > > > http://www.ino-ontology.org/ > > > > > > INO in Ontobee: http://www.ontobee.org/browser/index.php?o=INO > > > HINO in Ontobee: http://www.ontobee.org/browser/index.php?o=HINO > > > > > > Best, > > > Oliver > > > > > > > > > From: He, Yongqun > > > Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2014 3:16 PM > > > To: obo...@li... <mailto: > obo...@li...> > > > Cc: He, Yongqun > > > Subject: Request namespaces for INO (Interaction Network > Ontology) and > > > HINO (Human INO) > > > > > > Dear OBO-discuss: > > > > > > Here I would like to request two related namespaces for inclusion > in > > > the OBO Foundry ontology library: > > > (1) INO: Interaction Network Ontology > > > (2) HINO: Human Interaction Network Ontology, which is an > extension of > > > INO. > > > > > > INO is aligned with BFO. INO was initially developed to classify > and > > > represent different levels of interaction keywords used for > literature > > > mining of genetic interaction networks. The literature mining > strategy > > > and the INO name were described in our ontology-based literature > > > mining paper in 2011: > > > Ozgur A, Xiang Z, Radev D, He Y. Mining of > vaccine-associated > > > IFN-γ gene interaction networks using the Vaccine Ontology. > Journal > > > of Biomedical Semantics. 2011, 2(Suppl 2):S8. PMID: 21624163. > > > http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21624163 > > > > > > HINO is an extension of INO. HINO targets for ontologically > > > representing human interactions and networks. The rationale for > HINO > > > development is as follows: > > > Many resources, such as Reactome and KEGG, store manually > curated > > > interactions and pathways. However, there is no BFO-aligned > > > interaction pathway ontology that specifies the information > stored in > > > Reactome and other databases. The curated data are commonly > > > represented in BioPAX, an OWL-based biological pathway data > exchange > > > format. BioPAX represents these interactions and pathways as > > > instances. BioPAX is successful in facilitating data exchange. > > > However, individual entities, interactions, and pathways > represented > > > in BioPAX are all temporary instance IDs and cannot be exchanged > among > > > different resources. Given appropriate conditions, these > interactions > > > and pathways in Reactome and KEGG always occur. Therefore, they > are > > > more appropriately represented as ontology classes instead of > > > instances. The HINO is aimed to provide non-redundant > representations > > > of human molecular interactions, pathways, and networks. HINO was > > > presented in ICBO-2013 as a poster: > > > http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1060/icbo2013_submission_70.pdf > > > More detail about HINO was recently published in a preprint in > > > arXiv: > > > > > > - Abstract: http://arxiv.org/abs/1311.3355 > > > > > > - PDF full text: > > > http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1311/1311.3355.pdf > > > > > > Currently HINO only represents human molecular interactions and > > > networks knowledge stored in Reactome. We are working to add more > > > results from other interaction and pathway databases. > Cross-references > > > to the original database sources will be provided. > > > > > > Suggestions, comments, and collaborations are welcome and > appreciated. > > > > > > Thanks for your consideration, > > > > > > Oliver > > > > > > Yongqun "Oliver" He, DVM, PhD > > > Associate Professor > > > Unit for Laboratory Animal Medicine > > > Department of Microbiology and Immunology > > > Center for Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics > > > and Comprehensive Cancer Center > > > University of Michigan Medical School > > > Mail: 018 ARF, 1150 W. Medical Center Dr. > > > Ann Arbor, MI 48109 > > > Email: yon...@me... <mailto:yon...@me... > ><mailto:yon...@me... <mailto:yon...@me...>> > > > Tel: 734-615-8231 (O) > > > http://www.hegroup.org/ > > > > > > ********************************************************** > > > Electronic Mail is not secure, may not be read every day, and > should > > > not be used for urgent or sensitive issues > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > Subversion Kills Productivity. Get off Subversion & Make the Move > to > > > Perforce. > > > With Perforce, you get hassle-free workflows. Merge that actually > > > works. > > > Faster operations. Version large binaries. Built-in WAN > optimization > > > and the > > > freedom to use Git, Perforce or both. Make the move to Perforce. > > > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=122218951&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk_______________________________________________ > > > Obo-discuss mailing list > > > Obo...@li... <mailto: > Obo...@li...> > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/obo-discuss > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Subversion Kills Productivity. Get off Subversion & Make the Move to > Perforce. > > With Perforce, you get hassle-free workflows. Merge that actually > works. > > Faster operations. Version large binaries. Built-in WAN > optimization and the > > freedom to use Git, Perforce or both. Make the move to Perforce. > > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=122218951&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > > _______________________________________________ > > Obo-discuss mailing list > > Obo...@li... <mailto: > Obo...@li...> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/obo-discuss > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Subversion Kills Productivity. Get off Subversion & Make the Move to > Perforce. > > With Perforce, you get hassle-free workflows. Merge that actually works. > > Faster operations. Version large binaries. Built-in WAN optimization > and the > > freedom to use Git, Perforce or both. Make the move to Perforce. > > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=122218951&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Obo-discuss mailing list > > Obo...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/obo-discuss > > > > > -- > Nicolas LE NOVERE, Babraham Institute, Babraham Campus Cambridge, CB22 3AT > Tel: +441223496433 Mob:+447833147074 n.l...@gm... > orcid.org//0000-0002-6309-7327 http://lenoverelab.org/perso/lenov/ > Skype:n.lenovere twitter:@lenovere http://nlenov.wordpress.com/ > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Subversion Kills Productivity. Get off Subversion & Make the Move to > Perforce. > With Perforce, you get hassle-free workflows. Merge that actually works. > Faster operations. Version large binaries. Built-in WAN optimization and > the > freedom to use Git, Perforce or both. Make the move to Perforce. > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=122218951&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > _______________________________________________ > Obo-discuss mailing list > Obo...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/obo-discuss > |