Re: [Obo-discuss] Foundation Ontologies

[Chris M. <cjm...@lb...>]

Hi Tim,

I'm not sure there are any necessarily hard and fast SHOULDs or MUSTs here. You should be reusing existing ontologies where possible. Which ontologies? That depends on what it is you're doing - tell us more!

Cheers
Chris

On Jan 14, 2013, at 7:07 AM, Timothy W. Cook wrote:

> Hi All,
> 
> I have read through: Practice of the OBO Foundry
> as well as most other documentation I can find.
> 
> It is not clear to me which ontologies SHOULD be included and/or which
> MUST be included to establish an appropriate foundation for a new
> ontology to be included in the OBO library.
> 
> I am just at the beginning stages of development and I am still
> searching around for domain related ontologies that may be
> appropriate.
> 
> Are these the foundations:
> 
> bfo11.owl
> ro.owl
> 
> maybe:
> ro_bfo_bridge11.owl
> protege-dc.owl
> 
> Thanks for any help or pointers to documents I may have missed.  I'll
> be happy to document this as part of an FAQ or larger document if
> needed.
> 
> --Tim
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS,
> MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current
> with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft
> MVPs and experts. SALE $99.99 this month only -- learn more at:
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122412
> _______________________________________________
> Obo-discuss mailing list
> Obo...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/obo-discuss