From: Suzanna L. <su...@fr...> - 2006-05-30 01:11:45
|
On May 17, 2006, at 9:24 AM, Pankaj Jaiswal wrote: > Michael Ashburner (Genetics) wrote: > >> the CL Ontology has this term: >> [Term] >> id: CL:0000610 >> name: plant cell >> def: "A cell found in seeded plants." [TAIR:syr] >> is_a: CL:0000255 ! eukaryotic cell >> The Drosophila Anatomy ontology does not have a term 'cell'. >> Michael > > Just a quick check I did on anatomy files from all MODs except the > ones from gross plant anatomy sets', there were about 650 terms > that carry 'cell' either in its term name or synonym. There were no > instances generic cell of bacterial/fungal/human/etc. Only > microbial structure ontology had 'unicellular structure, FAO:0000018'. I hope the upshot of this is that you do use the term "plant cell" with id CL:0000610 > > Another question is do you think that we should also group the cell > types from individual MOD in the various anatomy ontologies as well > as in Cell type ontology. If not as Barry pointed out there might > be multiple usage of the same term name (there are few instances in > OBO anatomies). I don't understand the question, would you rephrase/explain more please? > > Pankaj > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, > security? > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your > job easier > Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache > Geronimo > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel? > cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 > _______________________________________________ > Obo-discuss mailing list > Obo...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/obo-discuss |