From: Bjoern P. <bp...@li...> - 2011-10-03 23:49:29
|
Dear May Yong, Have you considered to do your work within OBI rather than developing a new ontology? Everything you describe is in OBI's scope, and we would be grateful if you would consider working with us to extend the coverage of OBI to meet your specific use case. Best regards, Bjoern ----- Original Message ----- > Hello, > I am building an ontology for the experimental data collected from > translational research, performed in different models. I hope to > link the data from the early models (ie molecular, cell line) of > therapy/diagnosis development to the data from later stages (ie > experiments in human). This is to provide researchers and clinicians > a platform for selecting and directing therapy development. > As per your advice, I am surveying the relevant ontologies such as > PATO, ACGT-MO and DDI. They have a lot of classes that I would like > to reuse, and I have contacted their developers for further advise. > I would be grateful if you have any insights into the reuse and > combination of multiple ontologies, since my ontology will cover a > large domain area. > Thanks. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure > contains a > definitive record of customers, application performance, security > threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and > makes > sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1 > _______________________________________________ > Obo-discuss mailing list > Obo...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/obo-discuss |