Re: [Obo-format] Issue 13 in oboformat: singleton intersection_of tags

[<obo...@go...>]

Comment #9 on issue 13 by dosu...@gmail.com: singleton intersection_of tags
http://code.google.com/p/oboformat/issues/detail?id=13

Compared to roundtrip OWL > OBO > OWL, roundtrip OBO > OWL > OBO is both  
simpler, given the greater expressiveness of OWL, and much more needed,  
given that the ontology world is not exactly full of people who want to  
move from OWL to OBO.  For OWL to OBO, storing untranslate-able OWL axioms  
somewhere seems useful, and I agree that dumping them in a separate OWL  
file seems most sensible. But I think this is a lower priority than  
supporting the complete expressiveness of OBO in OBO > OWL > OBO roundtrips.