From: Melissa H. <mha...@uo...> - 2007-06-08 18:13:43
|
Hi all, I am curating a paper in which structures that are normally asymmetrically located are now randomly located. In PATO: pattern ---symmetry ------asymmetrical ------bilateral symmetry ------isometrical ------radial symmetry ------symmetrical The phenotype I am curating: at a certain stage, the heart is on the left side. In the mutant it is on the left, right, or absent. I could use E=heart Q=asymmetrical abnormal def:A symmetry quality inhering in a bearer by virtue of lacking symmetry. This seems to imply that the heart is not normally asymmetrically located and that the phenotype lacks symmetry, which is true but not really the essence of the phenotype. I could also annotate up to E=heart Q=symmetry abnormal, but this doesn't quite capture it either. I could also annotate it as E=GO:0007368 determination of left/right symmetry Q=disrupted abnormal E=heart Q=mislocalised abnormal def: GO:0007368 determination of left/right symmetry The establishment of an organism's body plan or part of an organism with respect to the left and right halves. The pattern can either be symmetric, such that the halves are mirror images, or asymmetric where the pattern deviates from this symmetry. Should there be a new term, bilateral asymmetry? or should the bilateral symmetry term be updated to include asymmetry like the GO definition? One of these two solutions would allow an annotation where the heart and the fact that its normal asymmetrical location was incorrect: E=heart Q=bilateral asymmetry abnormal OR E=heart Q=bilateral symmetry abnormal ---with an update to the definition. Any other ideas? Thanks, Melissa -- Melissa Haendel, Ph.D. ZFIN Scientific Curator Zebrafish Information Network 5291 University of Oregon Eugene, OR 97403-5291 Phone: (541) 346-5108 |