Re: [Obo-format] Progress on OBO format foundy compliant URI

[Alan R. <ala...@gm...>]

On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 11:45 AM, Jerven Bolleman
<jer...@is...> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Has there been any progress in the last year on determining what the foundry
> compliant URI scheme is going to be and when it will go into production.

The policy is documented at http://obofoundry.org/id-policy.shtml
Chris has been developing the OWL2 translation - we have prototype
versions on the obofoundry site:
http://www.berkeleybop.org/ontologies/ (search owl2)
and in the triple store http://sparql.obodev.neurocommons.org/

We will deploy page per term using Ontobee. E.g. go to
http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/OBI_0000566

So progress, but not yet complete.
We could probably find work for you if you want to help.

> In any case the classic purls do not work (for me)
> http://purl.org/obo/owl/GO#GO_0007049

Define "work". Any "#" uri will only return the full document. In this
case that document imports further documents.
Are you getting no response at all?

> Does anyone know where should I report bugs on that?

Here, and at obo...@ob...

Best,
Alan

>
> Regards,
> Jerven
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports
> standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1,  ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3.
> Spend less time writing and  rewriting code and more time creating great
> experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/msIE9-sfdev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> Obo-format mailing list
> Obo...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/obo-format
>
>