Re: [Oap-discuss] TI Powertrends 78ST105HC Replacement
Status: Alpha
Brought to you by:
dwalters
|
From: Dafydd W. <daf...@gm...> - 2013-12-01 09:31:38
|
Hi Scott, When I drew the original prototype schematics, I wondered about separating the power regulation, and running the regulated 5V around some of the modules, but then I backed away from the idea, because I was concerned about noise crosstalk between the modules (the sonar module is particularly thirsty and "spikey" in power needs, and the pan-tilt module isn't much better IIRC). I stuck with separate regulators in the end, so you could wire up each module directly to the robot's main lead-acid battery with little risk of introducing noise crosstalk. If you decide to go down this central power regulation path, though, I would strongly encourage you to add multiple 5V output connectors to the power board, to encourage the power to be distributed in a "star" configuration to each module, rather than in a "bus" configuration (the latter is just asking for trouble). I would also check to make sure that you don't break the bank in terms of current capacity and make sure that the heat-sink is adequate to deal with all the sonars firing at full-pelt at the same time as the pan and tilt servos are moving (with a realistic head load mounted). The thickness of the wiring between such a power module and the modules must also be considered; the gauge has to be adequate to carry the current for each module. If you do this, it's probably a good idea to add a decent sized reservoir cap (electrolytic, about 100uF) at the power input of each module to help smooth the bumps too. Regards, Dafydd. 2013/11/29 Scott Crawford <rob...@gm...> > Hi Dafydd, > > Thanks for the feedback on the schematic updates. > > I've added another i2c connector the HCM to support the TPA81. > http://www.openautomaton.org/index.php/HCM > > I'm working on the TI Powetrends replacement schematic and PCB layout. > Replacing these surface mounted components with through-hole equivalents > will increase the PCB sizes, and drive up the component cost a few > dollars. While the LM2592HV costs less than the TI Powertrends, it means > that the designer must supply a heatsink, inductor, and schottky diode. > > What do you think about reducing the number of DC-DC regulators in the > design? The TI powetrends is used on the PMM, HCM, and SAM. > > Could a single DC-DC PCB be used to power the PMM PIC, and supply the 5V > LCD display, HCM, and SAM? > > Thanks, > --scott c. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT > organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance > affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your > Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics > Pro! > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349351&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > _______________________________________________ > Oap-discuss mailing list > Oap...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oap-discuss > > -- LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/dafyddwalters |