Re: [Numpy-discussion] Timings for various round functions

[Bill B. <wb...@gm...>]

On 2/23/06, Travis Oliphant <oli...@ie...> wrote:
>Sasha wrote:

>I think we have agreed that C99 functions are good candidates to become
>ufuncs.  The only problem is figuring out what to do on platforms that
>don't define them.

>For example, we could define a separate module of C99 functions that is
>only available on certain platforms.


Might this be some help?  http://mega-nerd.com/FPcast/

--Bill