Re: [Numpy-discussion] cross product of two 3xn arrays

[Charles R H. <cha...@gm...>]

Bill,

On 2/16/06, Bill Baxter <wb...@gm...> wrote:
> Quaternions using which convention?  [s,x,y,z] or [x,y,z,w]?
> The docstring should make it very clear.  Perhaps support a flag for
> choosing which, unless there's some python-wide standard for quaternions
> that I'm not aware of.
>
> --Bill
>
>
> On 2/17/06, Charles R Harris <cha...@gm...> wrote:
> > Would anyone be interested in a quaternion version of this for nx4
> > arrays with nx3 as a special case where the scalar part =3D=3D 0? Looki=
ng
> > at the the cross product implementation, it shouldn't be to hard to
> > duplicate this for quaternions. What should such a product be called?
> > Something like qprod?
> >
> > Chuck
> >
> >

I like to put the scalar last, but I am open to putting it first if
anyone has strong feelings about it. As far as I know, there is no
scipy convention on this. Hmm, maybe a flag would be useful just
because folks are likely to have files sitting around full of
quaternions using both conventions. Maybe one more scalar type to add
to the NumPy mix? I must admit that dtype=3DQuaternion512 seems a bit
much. Anyway, I am open to suggestions.