Re: [Numpy-discussion] NumPy Glossary: a request for review

[Sasha <nd...@ma...>]

I updated the "broadcasting" entry. I don't think examples belong to a
glossary. I think a glossary should be more like a quick reference
rather than a tutorial.  Unfortunately the broadcasting is one of
those concepts that will never be clear without examples.

On 2/11/06, Zachary Pincus <zp...@st...> wrote:
> The "broadcasting" entry is somewhat unclear in terms of what
> "conforming" array shapes are. Perhaps "compatible shapes" would be
> better, coupled with an example or two of "compatible" shapes, and/or
> a precise definition of how compatibility is determined.