|
From: Alan G I. <ai...@am...> - 2006-02-09 14:38:47
|
On Thu, 9 Feb 2006, Bruce Southey apparently wrote: > The example of ndim to give the rank is not the same as the Matlab > function rank(a). See > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rank_of_a_matrix for definition of rank > that I would think that most people would use if they use Matlab Coming from GAUSS and having never studies tensors, I was also surprised by the 'rank' terminology. I believe this is why Travis changed to ndim, which is less likely to confuse users coming from a linear algebra perspective. Unfortunately the SciPy book currently uses the term 'rank' in the two conflicting ways. (It uses 'rank' in the linear algebra sense only in the discussion of lstsq on p.145.) It might be helpful for the tensor sense to always be qualified as 'tensor rank'? Cheers, Alan Isaac |