|
From: Sven S. <sve...@gm...> - 2006-02-09 00:08:55
|
Christopher Barker schrieb: > > numpy is not a Matlab clone, nor should it be. That's exactly why I use > it! Take a little time to get used to it, and you'll become very glad > that numpy works the way it does, rather than like Matlab. > well, I have taken that time because I was already into python (glue everyting together, you know), but I bet you won't be very successful in the Gauss et al. camp with that marketing slogan... also, your statement does not sound very pythonic; the "you'll get used to it, and trust me, even if you don't understand it now, it's great afterwards"-approach sounds more like the pre-python era (you may insert a language of your choice here ;-) I don't see why numpy cannot preserve the features that are important to you (and which I know nothing about) and at the same time make life more intuitive and easier for 2d-dummies like myself -- in a lot of ways, it's already accomplished, I'd say it just needs the finishing touch. cheers, sven |