|
From: Francesc A. <fa...@ca...> - 2006-01-19 09:12:38
|
A Dimecres 18 Gener 2006 20:55, Travis Oliphant va escriure: > I think the indexing code will be slower because it is more > sophisticated than Numeric's. Basically, it has to check for fancy > indexing before defaulting to the old way. I see this as more of a > slow-down than array creation. It might be possible to improve it --- > more eyeballs are always helpful. But, I'm not sure how at this point. I'm sure you already know this: http://oprofile.sourceforge.net It is a nice way to do profiling at C level on Linux machines. Running the Paulo benchmarks through oprofile can surely bring some light. Cheers, =2D-=20 >0,0< Francesc Altet =C2=A0 =C2=A0 http://www.carabos.com/ V V C=C3=A1rabos Coop. V. =C2=A0=C2=A0Enjoy Data "-" |