|
From: Bruce S. <bso...@gm...> - 2006-01-06 14:23:09
|
I am also +1 to keep numpy for the same reasons as Colin and Chris. So far there has been nothing in alpha SciPy versions that offer any advantage ove= r Numarray for what I use or develop. Bruce On 1/5/06, Christopher Barker <Chr...@no...> wrote: > > Colin J. Williams wrote: > > It seems to me that NumPy is the better way to go, the archives and > > downloads are more readily available there, but it's up to Todd Miller > > and the folk who have been maintaining NumPy. > > > > NumPy has been around for a while, probably longer than SciPy. > > I, for one, am only subscribed to the NumPy list, and have been for > years. I don't know how much non-NumPy stuff there is on the SciPy list, > but while I do use NumPy for Scientific stuff, I don't use the rest of > SciPy (because, frankly, it's always been a pain in the @#! to install) > and I don't need another high-traffic list. > > +1 numpy-discussion > > -Chris > > > -- > Christopher Barker, Ph.D. > Oceanographer > > NOAA/OR&R/HAZMAT (206) 526-6959 voice > 7600 Sand Point Way NE (206) 526-6329 fax > Seattle, WA 98115 (206) 526-6317 main reception > > Chr...@no... > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log > files > for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes > searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3D7637&alloc_id=3D16865&op=3Dclick > _______________________________________________ > Numpy-discussion mailing list > Num...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/numpy-discussion > |