Re: [Numpy-discussion] Re: [SciPy-user] [SciPy-dev] Long live to numpy (and its list as well)

[Christopher B. <Chr...@no...>]

Colin J. Williams wrote:
> It seems to me that NumPy is the better way to go, the archives and 
> downloads are more readily available there, but it's up to Todd Miller 
> and the folk who have been maintaining NumPy.
> 
> NumPy has been around for a while, probably longer than SciPy.

I, for one, am only subscribed to the NumPy list, and have been for 
years. I don't know how much non-NumPy stuff there is on the SciPy list, 
but while I do use NumPy for Scientific stuff, I don't use the rest of 
SciPy (because, frankly, it's always been a pain in the @#! to install) 
and I don't need another high-traffic list.

+1 numpy-discussion

-Chris


-- 
Christopher Barker, Ph.D.
Oceanographer
                                     		
NOAA/OR&R/HAZMAT         (206) 526-6959   voice
7600 Sand Point Way NE   (206) 526-6329   fax
Seattle, WA  98115       (206) 526-6317   main reception

Chr...@no...