|
From: Francesc A. <fa...@ca...> - 2005-11-08 07:53:57
|
El dl 07 de 11 del 2005 a les 15:50 +0100, en/na kh...@ce... va escriure: > Has anyone actually done this for a non-trivial package? What stops =20 > me from even trying scipy.core is the large number of incompatible =20 > changes, even though they are mostly superficial. Well, I would like to migrate PyTables to scipy.core in the medium term. My plan to not bother the users is to start supporting scipy.base by using the array protocol. That means that, although numarray will still be at the core, users will be able to send and retrieve scipy.core objects into the library with almost native speed (thanks to the array protocol). When scipy.core eventually matures enough, I'll put it at the core of PyTables, while still supporting numarray and Numeric, and the users will (hopefully) hardly notice the change, becuase they will be able to use whatever numeric library they want, and the migration will be up to them. I really think that the array protocol (that already is supported in latest Numeric and numarray, bar some small issues) is a Good Thing (tm) to consider, specially for the developers. Cheers, --=20 >0,0< Francesc Altet http://www.carabos.com/ V V C=E1rabos Coop. V. Enjoy Data "-" |