|
From: Francesc A. <fa...@ca...> - 2005-10-29 16:06:09
|
El dv 28 de 10 del 2005 a les 14:52 -0600, en/na Travis Oliphant va escriure: > > Todd Miller wrote: > > I don't know if it does right now. Just to be clear, what Francesc=20 > > was talking about is *supplying* the array buffer from numarray as=20 > > apparently defined in the __get_array_data__ method. If 24b was the=20 > > first time the array interface ever worked it sounds ok to leave your=20 > > changes in and force an upgrade to 24 if a user uses that feature. =20 > > Francesc? > Right, he was talking about just supplying the array data information=20 > from numarray. >=20 > And, yes, Numeric 24b was the first time the array interface ever worked. Yes, I think that if Numeric 24b was the first implementing the array interface, then there is no need to touch nothing in numarray. As you said, I should make Numeric 24.0 a requisite for running our software. Thanks for clarificating the issue, --=20 >0,0< Francesc Altet http://www.carabos.com/ V V C=E1rabos Coop. V. Enjoy Data "-" |