|
From: Matthew B. <mat...@gm...> - 2005-10-09 20:06:59
|
Hi, > While I fully respect the opinion of those concerned about Travis' decisi= on, I > have to say that I am personally not so worried. At scipy'05, when Travi= s > announced the book idea, I asked a very simple question: 'are the docstri= ngs > complete?'. His answer was 'yes'. > > There was a good reason for my asking this question: I personally find t= hat > when coding, the most productive and efficient to learn a library is by t= yping > > import foo > foo.<TAB> > > and then > > foo.bar? Just a tiny addition. I know what you mean, but my experience is of someone recently trying to learn numarray / Numeric, and I suspect I am not alone in printing out the documentation and reading a moderate amount of it before I get started. Call me old-fashioned (it wouldn't be the first time!), See you, Matthew |