|
From: Darren D. <dd...@co...> - 2005-07-29 16:28:46
|
On Friday 29 July 2005 12:22 pm, Chris Barker wrote: > > To find out you might have to look at the LAPACK functions you are > > using and compare them against the ones provided by ATLAS. > > Well, I'm testing using LinearAlgebra.solve_linear_equations() from > Numeric (and numarray). The reason I'm wondering is that on my last > machine, a 1ghz PIII laptop running Gentoo, using the Gentoo provided > atlas/lapack, I got a 6-7 times speed up over lapack_lite. > > On my new machine, a 2GHz Pentium M laptop running FC4, I got about a 2 > times speed-up, which is nice, but not nearly as impressive. > > Another possible issue is that I used pre-complied binaries form the > atlas site, which are a bit old, maybe I should compile myself. Any > thoughts? Maybe I don't understanding something, but isn't the point of ATLAS that the libraries are tuned at compile time for your specific setup? -- Darren |