From: Arnout E. <no...@bz...> - 2014-01-16 13:05:46
|
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Jeff Backus <jef...@gm...> wrote: > >> There is, however, also good news: as far as I can see, the things that >> are considered 'too restrictive' are not in the license itself, but in >> claims/interpretations/expressed 'intentions' by Tuomo. Basically those are >> irrelevant: what's relevant is what's actually in the license, not what has >> been said about it after the fact. >> >> > With the exception that he agrees that the name Notion does not violate > the license. That bit is relevant. :) > Well, sure, but not to the question whether or not the license is DFSG-free. I'm still waiting for a response from RedHat Legal re: Fedora. Their > response may help convince the Debian team. > Looking forward to it! > I've updated >> https://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/notion/index.php?title=Licensing_FAQ for >> a little bit. >> >> Hmm - I can't seem to access the wiki anymore. Clicking on the above link > prompts me to log in and clicking on the link on the home page takes me to > a blank page. Hopefully it's just a burp on SourceForge's end. > Producing blank pages for me now... looks like something on their end indeed. Arnout |