From: Jeff B. <jef...@gm...> - 2014-01-16 12:39:25
|
> > > There is, however, also good news: as far as I can see, the things that > are considered 'too restrictive' are not in the license itself, but in > claims/interpretations/expressed 'intentions' by Tuomo. Basically those are > irrelevant: what's relevant is what's actually in the license, not what has > been said about it after the fact. > > With the exception that he agrees that the name Notion does not violate the license. That bit is relevant. :) I'm still waiting for a response from RedHat Legal re: Fedora. Their response may help convince the Debian team. > I've updated > https://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/notion/index.php?title=Licensing_FAQ for > a little bit. > > Hmm - I can't seem to access the wiki anymore. Clicking on the above link prompts me to log in and clicking on the link on the home page takes me to a blank page. Hopefully it's just a burp on SourceForge's end. Regards, Jeff -- Jeff Backus jef...@gm... http://github.com/jsbackus |