From: Philipp H. <phi...@un...> - 2011-10-31 13:39:14
|
> > I think this would be a better place to start. > > Obviously Actually the diff between the two debian folders is rather small. It should be straightforward to just merge it with the changes you have already done. > > What's the policy on pwm3? Is this supposed to be renamed to pwm3plus > > everywere? > > Do we want to keep pwm at all? Or do we want to drop it entirely? Personally I had never even heard of pwm3 to this day. The man page says that it is identical to Ion3 with the only difference lying in the default configuration file. I certainly don't see a reason to ship a separate binary file for that but that's just my personal opinion. There is a discussion about the same question here: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=261076 Maybe dropping pwm3 but documenting the configuration necessary to achieve its behavior with notion is the right thing to do? > > Lintian and others don't seem to be too happy about your choice of version > > number because they consider it to be older than the Ion3 versions (the > > leading 3 is the problem). Maybe just drop it? > > I'm not sure - using *just* the date as the version would get us into trouble > when we ever want a 'Notion 4' (a major rewrite or something). Having seperate > packages for those (like 'ion2' and 'ion3' previously) would be something I'd > probably like to avoid. OTOH if it really warrants a new major version number > perhaps it should allow users to have both installed alongside each other. What > do you think? How about just dropping the Ion3 history from the changelog and write "Inital release. Based on the Ion3 package, version 20090110-3, by Ben Hutchings." or something like that. This would give us complete liberty in the version numbers. Are you against version numbers like 3.0? I would leave the name at notion for the moment, we would then still have the option of releasing a notion4 package with all files renamed to notion4 if that looks like the reasonable thing to do at some point in the future. Regards, Philipp |