From: David G. <dg...@co...> - 2011-10-22 10:20:50
|
On 22/10/11 00:11, Arnout Engelen wrote: > Seems quite short and sweet. 'Define a tweak' is a bit too terse for the > documentation imho - you should at least explain what a 'tweak' is/does. Is > 'tweak' a good name? I haven't done any documentation yet (it it built from those --DOC comments, or does it live anywhere else?). And I'm not sold on the name. defwinproptweak? Something else? -- ┌─── dg@cowlark.com ───── http://www.cowlark.com ───── │ │ "Under communism, man exploits man. Under capitalism, it's just the │ opposite." --- John Kenneth Galbrith |