From: Arnout E. <no...@bz...> - 2011-05-14 16:26:25
|
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 07:24:29AM -0400, Etan Reisner wrote: > I'm also open to simply having system.mk include (without failing if it > doesn't exit) a local.mk (or similar) file to allow these sort of > custom definitions. This sounds like an elegant solution to me - any drawbacks we can think of? Arnout |