From: Arnout E. <no...@bz...> - 2011-03-31 23:01:24
|
On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 12:12:13AM +0200, Javier Rojas wrote: > On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 11:27:37PM +0200, Arnout Engelen wrote: > > - When WScreen 1 is on monitor A and WScreen 2 is on monitor B, and the > > relative locations are changed (monitor A moves from being left of monitor B > > to being right of monitor B), what should happen? > > > > The latter is not an obvious choice, I think it would make sense to keep > > WScreen 1 on monitor A and WScreen 2 on monitor B. This way it's really just > > the relative locations that change and not the contents of the windows. As an > > additional plus, the WScreens don't have to be resized as long as the monitors > > don't switch resolutions. > > Thw WScreens should be swapped. Otherwise the relative location change > would go unnoticed by the user (who either caused that change on purpose > and expects the screens to swap It would not go unnoticed: the mouse pointer would be moved from monitor A to monitor B by moving it off the other edge of monitor A. I think you change the relative locations of screens when their physical relative locations change. In that case it does make sense to keep windows that were on physical screen A on physical screen A. > or got that screen swap unvoluntarily and should be notified), Does that ever happen in reality? > and stuff like mappings to change screen would get its semantics reversed. I'm not sure what you mean here? Arnout |