From: kevin g. <kev...@gm...> - 2011-01-28 15:49:43
|
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 5:55 AM, Arnout Engelen <no...@bz...> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 04:37:08PM -0600, kevin granade wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Arnout Engelen <no...@bz...> wrote: >> > It's useful to also check the work done by committers, and I absolutely welcome >> > you looking into this. >> > >> > For now we don't have many reviewers (afaics you're one of the relatively few >> > people here with the skills required, and you mentioned earlier you don't have >> > much time for this). Because of this I think it would be unpractical to >> > require that work done by a committer himself is always first reviewed by a >> > second reviewer before being committed. It's up to the committer to take >> > responsibility and first consult the mailinglists before making changes that >> > might be controversial - hence the post that started this thread ;). Aside >> > from that commits can of course be reviewed after commiting. >> >> Perhaps patches should go to the mailing list regardless so that potential >> reviewers can look them over as time is available. > > A (seperate) 'notion-commits' mailinglists would be nice. > > Until that's set up, you can track > http://notion.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=notion/notion;a=rss or > https://sourceforge.net/export/rss2_keepsake.php?group_id=314802 > Ah! Thanks for that pointer. I'll take advantage of it. > You can also join the #notion IRC channel on irc.freenode.net, commits are > announced and often discussed there. > >> (I'm actually thinking of myself here) > > Feel free! > > > Kind regards, > > Arnout > |