From: Arnout E. <no...@bz...> - 2011-01-28 11:55:30
|
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 04:37:08PM -0600, kevin granade wrote: > On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Arnout Engelen <no...@bz...> wrote: > > It's useful to also check the work done by committers, and I absolutely welcome > > you looking into this. > > > > For now we don't have many reviewers (afaics you're one of the relatively few > > people here with the skills required, and you mentioned earlier you don't have > > much time for this). Because of this I think it would be unpractical to > > require that work done by a committer himself is always first reviewed by a > > second reviewer before being committed. It's up to the committer to take > > responsibility and first consult the mailinglists before making changes that > > might be controversial - hence the post that started this thread ;). Aside > > from that commits can of course be reviewed after commiting. > > Perhaps patches should go to the mailing list regardless so that potential > reviewers can look them over as time is available. A (seperate) 'notion-commits' mailinglists would be nice. Until that's set up, you can track http://notion.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=notion/notion;a=rss or https://sourceforge.net/export/rss2_keepsake.php?group_id=314802 You can also join the #notion IRC channel on irc.freenode.net, commits are announced and often discussed there. > (I'm actually thinking of myself here) Feel free! Kind regards, Arnout |