From: Olof J. <ol...@et...> - 2010-08-20 17:23:34
|
On 2010-08-20 16:36, M Rawash wrote: > On Fri, 2010-08-20 at 13:19 +0000, Olof Johansson wrote: > > That is about GPL, not LGPL, I'm not sure, but I don't think they are > > as strict about the latter. (Don't take my word for it though.) > > LGPL is indeed less strict than the GPL, but only in practice (for > example, you can convert LGPLed code to GPL, but not the other way > around), LGPL is essentially GPL for libraries, they are both > copyrighted by the Free Software Foundation, and that's why they are not > to be modified under any circumstances, unless you have a special > permission from the copyright holder (the FSF). Uhm, yeah, that's not what I meant. I meant I think FSF is a bit less strict about how you use LGPL than they are about how you use GPL. But as I said, I'm not certain. But nevermind, I think we're somewhat on the same page now. -- Olof Johansson irc: zibri on Freenode/OFTC jabber: ol...@et... |