From: Olof J. <ol...@et...> - 2010-08-20 05:39:42
|
On 2010-08-20 04:56, M Rawash wrote: > I can't say i'm 100% behind this, but it does seem like our best/last > option at this point, I'd also suggest that we have a separate license > file (let's say LICENSE-notion) which we can refer to instead of Tuomo's > made-up license, this way we will at least look like we're trying to > make it "free" (also, doesn't put us at odds with the LGPL; continuing > the (ab)use of Tuomo's license does!), but more on that later... It's Tuomo's code, he decides the rules. It's not an abuse, even though you might not like it. What you propose however sounds like it could be, but on the other hand it was probably just bad wording... -- Olof Johansson irc: zibri on Freenode/OFTC jabber: ol...@et... |