From: Juri H. <ju...@fa...> - 2010-04-26 21:12:14
|
It looks like the progress has stopped because of the problems with the license and lack of energy to start developing from the point where license became "unfree". Would it be enough, if someone (me for example) mails to Tuomo a text asking to "approve" something like: "Me, Tuomo Valkonen, permit the project "notion" to remove the special clause: 'In the text of sections 0-2, 4-12, and 14-16 of the LGPL, "this License" is to be understood to refer to the LGPL extended with these terms and, where applicable, possible similar terms related to the names of other works forming a whole. Sections 3 and 13 of the LGPL are void. Where contradictory, these additional terms take precedence over the LGPL.' (did i miss something else?) from the Ion3 License of <date>, provided that all references to the Ion3 project (including the names of directories and executables) are removed. " Would be a pgp-signed reply of Tuomo with text "Approved" enough? I hope he does use pgp by default, because if he doesn't, he would not waste his time to set it up just to permit "fosstards fosstardings his project" (i guess you know what i mean). But if we do create a text where he just have to press the "reply" and "send" buttons, he would possibly do it, just to make us let him alone. What do you think? Juri |