From: Juri H. <ju...@fa...> - 2010-04-19 10:44:19
|
Domingo Gomez schrieb: > I agree. That's what Tuomo has always said, as long as you don't use > ion, it's just GPL. > Maybe we should contact a distribution Debian, Ubuntu, whatever to make the legal issue clear. I am sure they are more experienced with that and probably have an internal lawyer for things like this. > One related thing, distro inclusion is not what the users right now want. > Everybody here has installed from source and I don't think any common > ubuntu > user want to install it anyway. > > > Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 22:01:55 +0200 > > From: eb...@dr... > > To: not...@li... > > Subject: Re: [Notion-devel] One question > > > > I'm now lazy to check the license, but AFAIK, the situation will be > > totally different. The license prohibits the distributions to patch > > it by themselves and name it /ion/. Now when the project's name will > > not be /ion/, is there any problem with the license? Debian includes > > not only GPL-license, but also BSD-license, Apache-license, > > Perl-license, and so on. I think that the license is also "free" as long > > as the project's name is not /ion/. Please correct me if I understand > > it bad. |