Re: [Notion-devel] One question

[ebik <eb...@dr...>]

I'm now lazy to check the license, but AFAIK, the situation will be
totally different. The license prohibits the distributions to patch
it by themselves and name it /ion/. Now when the project's name will
not be /ion/, is there any problem with the license? Debian includes
not only GPL-license, but also BSD-license, Apache-license,
Perl-license, and so on. I think that the license is also "free" as long
as the project's name is not /ion/. Please correct me if I understand
it bad.

On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 11:38:07 -0400
Aron Griffis <agr...@n0...> wrote:

> Domingo Gomez wrote:  [Thu Apr 15 2010, 03:47:31AM EDT]
> > One question, I still don't understand  what happens if we keep the
> > license as it is.
> > Okay, it is not GPL, but the only thing that's important is to have
> > a roadmap.
> 
> The current license can cause problems for distro inclusion, as
> it has already in the past. IMHO distro inclusion is important so
> people don't need to always install from source, rather we can
> eventually "aptitude install notion"
> 
> Aron
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
> Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
> proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
> _______________________________________________
> Notion-devel mailing list
> Not...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/notion-devel
> 


-- 
                                 Tomáš 'ebík' Ebenlendr
                                 PF 2010.29017703577