From: Aron G. <agr...@n0...> - 2010-04-12 21:47:37
|
M Rawash wrote: [Mon Apr 12 2010, 03:50:56PM EDT] >On Mon, 2010-04-12 at 14:30 -0400, Marc Hartstein wrote: >> Excerpts from M Rawash's message of Mon Apr 12 11:25:54 -0400 2010: >> > - fork Ion and change the license (possibly to GPL), this will leave us >> > vulnerable to Tuomo's hostility (assuming he is indeed hostile), since >> > it's basically 'illegal' in light of Tuomo's additional terms (which, >> > according to Tuomo, "take precedence over the LGPL"). >> >> It seems a fork-and-rename is consistent with the intent, if not the >> terms, of the modified LGPL. > >intent, maybe, terms, not so sure; if so, i believe Tuomo >"unintentionally" made it impossible to fork Ion under a different >license, that's why we're still in need of a clarification on his part, >and if that indeed was his intention, we have to consider other options. To me it seems irrelevant in any case. If Tuomo doesn't clarify and/or give his blessing on a fork, then we are putting distro inclusion at risk. Tuomo would only need to complain and a distro would kick notion out instantly rather than deal with it. Aron |